- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > > The <content> element is the one that is an explicit child of A. So > > that's what gets "repositioned". And in the final flattened tree, it > > gets replaced by what matches it, as normal. > > So in other words, in the flattened tree nodes 4 and 5 can't be > repositioned to different <content> insertion points in the binding > attached to A (since it's the <content> node that's a child of A being > repositioned, you can't filter 4 and 5 into different insertion points). Good point. Let me get back to you. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 30 July 2005 18:38:50 UTC