- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:59:45 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Cameron McCormack" <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au> wrote in message news:20050220003303.GA17286@port.mcc.id.au... > > Bjoern Hoehrmann: >> Please change the draft such that all of this is well-defined. > > It's a good point. If DOM 3 is required, why not utilitise DOM 3 Load > and Save for this functionality, where the intricacies of parsing and > serialisation are taken into consideration? And then write printNode > and parseXML in terms of DOM 3 LS. DOM 3 LS contains some very unfriendly things which encourage bad usage in ecmascript (things like synchronous http requests, async is even only "optional") it requires PUT support on the server, it has a whole http specific functionality that really has no place in serialising and parsing XML - it doesn't have anything like enough general HTTP functionality to be the sole HTTP functionality provided for an application, yet it requires some. We want simple single interfaces for doing things, we don't want 5 different ways to make an HTTP request, nor do we want it to be limited to valid XML. Jim.
Received on Sunday, 20 February 2005 02:01:00 UTC