- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:30:56 +0100
- To: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Well, it would seem to me that the restriction is that duplicate > id's are not allowed on any two Elements that can be reached via > the DOM tree traversal methods (getParentNode, firstChild, nextSibling, > etc). If the node is in the document then all of it's > nodes are reachable from all other nodes in the document and thus > the id's in the SVG element's subtree must not duplicate any in the > rest of the document tree. I don't think this part is any different > from the behavior of any existing conforming DOM implementation. Do you have a reference for this? I couldn't find anything in the DOM allowing (or forbidding) such behaviour. Nodes that aren't attached to the hierarchy still belong to the document. I could well see an implementation that doesn't check to see if a node is attached or not before indexing IDs in a global ID table (in fact I know of at least one that does that). In fact, if I read DOM 3 Core correctly, the attachement of the node to the tree appears to be irrelevant. If you look at the spec, the isId field on Attr says "when it is [of type ID] and its value is unique, the ownerElement of this attribute can be retrieved using the method Document.getElementById"[0]. Based on that, I would expect that given element 'el' not attached to the tree but belonging to document 'doc' and having an attribute 'foo' of value 'bar', if I did el.setIdAttribute('foo', true) it appears to be expected that doc.getElementById('bar') would return el. [0]http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html#Attr-isId -- Robin Berjon Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 09:31:02 UTC