- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 04:58:06 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, Section 6.3 of the latest sXBL Working Draft states [...] The DOM implementation is expected to use the attribute Attr.isId to determine if an attribute is of type ID. [...] The term "is expected to" is not defined in the document and it is not clear to me what it means with respect to conformance. I think this should be replaced by RFC 2119 keywords as used in other parts of the document. [...] Attributes with the name "ID" or "id" are not of type ID unless so defined. For example, elements with the name "id" on elements that are in the XHTML, SVG and XBL namespaces are defined to be of type ID by their respective specifications. [...] This is not exactly correct, for example an id attribute on an element with a local-name of html and a namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml is not of type ID, at least there is no prose description that says so in any of the XHTML Recommendations and for XHTML document types it would be non-conforming behavior to consider /x:html/@id isId. The reference to XHTML should thus be removed from this ... what is this exactly? Section 1.3 states that this is normative content, yet it seems to be an informative note? I think there should be a normative part in the specification that states that all such notes are informative. regards.
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2004 02:58:50 UTC