- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:20:38 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Chris. Chris Lilley: > Since you mention XSLT, its important to note a big difference between > XSLT and sXBL. In XSLT, its a one-shot, batch-like transform. If any > changes are made to the result, they have no effect on the source and do > not cause the transform to re-run; similarly if there are changes to the > source they do not affect the result and do not cause the transform to > re-run. Its certainly possible to imagine a continuously looping XSLT > process triggered by mutation events (at least, for source changes) but > its hard to iimagine event flow in the result tree continuing > uniinterrupted in that case. I'm not quite sure I see the problem with events there. Is there really any difference between shadow tree regeneration occuring because of xsl:stylesheet modification and because of xbl:template modification? > Nor do we. Please see > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDsemantics-32.html > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id-req/ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20040407/ Ah, these seem like a sensible suggestion! Cameron -- Cameron McCormack | Web: http://mcc.id.au/ | ICQ: 26955922
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 11:20:43 UTC