- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:07:42 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Robin Berjon wrote: >> 2.2. The definition Element - asks for comment on "semantics". I >> believe the proper expression is "The definition element defines a >> presentation and behavior binding. It does not affect the intent >> expressed by an element." > >That seems to keep coming back to haunt us :) Your wording might do the >trick, though I'm not sure I've seen elements expressing intent. Maybe >I'm just not listening. It get the feeling the Task Force is merely looking for some poor excuse for that the <definition element="foo"> construct has nothing to do with the definition of the foo element...
Received on Friday, 22 October 2004 20:08:25 UTC