- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:49:23 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:200411180739.iAI7d6302349@djwhome.demon.co.uk... > >> One of the reasons that his is such a hot button issue for me is because >> I have felt strongly for some time that SVG is "almost" complete, but is > > It is a long way from complete, even compared with PDF, as it doesn't > include the semantic overlay, It's a semantic rendering language, the semantics are in the rendering, if you're wanting to include non graphical semantics, then your only choice is to provide that in another language, either through the metadata element or now with sXBL. > At least one of the key parts of CSS, which is both most challenging > to SVG and independent of the CSS syntax, is to meet accessibility > requirements, namely user style sheets. User Style sheets are only an appropriate way to meet accessibility requirements if the content isn't presentational, which SVG is, users cannot style things with presentational semantics, it's simply impossible. Jim.
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2004 08:49:29 UTC