- From: James Bentley <James.Bentley@guideworkstv.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:04:59 -0700
- To: 'Scooter Morris' <scooter@cgl.ucsf.edu>, www-svg@w3c.org
What is the SVG WG response to the following comment - I may have missed it. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Scooter Morris Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 11:31 PM To: www-svg@w3c.org Subject: SVG 1.2 Comments " * *General comments* *It is my belief that the focus of SVG should be on Scalable Vector Graphics, regardless of the pressures put on the working group by constuencies that are hoping to provide a broader base upon which to build applications. In Section 5.1 of the Architecture of the World Wide Web, it clearly states that "Orthogonal abstractions benefit from orthogonal specifications" and that "A specification should clearly indicate which features advance into territory rightfully governed by another specification." "
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 16:25:09 UTC