- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:41:36 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, ietf-types@iana.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >>>BH> The W3C Markup Validator considers resources such as >>> >>>BH> Content-Type: image/svg+xml;charset=iso-8859-1 >>> >>>BH> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> >>>BH> ... >>> >>>BH> ISO-8859-1 encoded. >>> >>>Yes, there are two inconsistent pieces of metadata and the markup >>>validator correctly applies the rules to determine which to use. > >BH> What makes you think there is inconsistent metadata here? > >The encoding is declared in two places, and they are different. One is >the charset parameter, and one is the xml encoding declaration. Why does the charset parameter in the example above declare an encoding? >From http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/mimereg.html it should be clear that the is no charset parameter and it thus cannot have such semantics, so there is no inconsistency here.
Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 21:42:25 UTC