Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: 4 Flowing text and graphics

At 09:24 AM 11/1/2004 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > So far I am not sure how exactly your proposal would differ in terms of
> > glyph positioning. It appears that your proposal effectively rephrases
> > SVG 1.2 algorithm.
>
>My proposal is merely an extension to the CSS model. It is quite different
>from the proposed SVG model, which is itself quite different from the CSS
>model (for example, the SVG model does not support 'line-height' or
>'vertical-align', and doesn't support the CSS box model on inlines).

Can you name a case where your proposal would produce different result from 
SVG 1.2, if no features which are not in SVG 1.2 are used? Having analyzed 
the algorithm I do not see the difference you are talking about.

Peter

Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 10:32:59 UTC