- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:09:22 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote in message news:40ED95B8.4040800@ocallahan.org... > > Thomas DeWeese wrote: >> Or looking at it the other way. Using XHTML/CSS I would have to >> convert/copy all my flow geometry (which I am probably already >> drawing) into CSS syntax. I will lose the ability to use things like >> the path transformers or anything else that the XHTML/CSS WG saw fit >> not to duplicate. > > No. Just make the CSS property refer to SVG elements by ID. Use something > like "flow-shape: shape(#myshape, exclude(#cutout))". And we would use be able to use this in XHTML user agents? Also you're now requiring SVG user agents to have a CSS engine (something that is not required previously and not something that the majority of SVG user agents have.) I do not think this is a good idea, most particularly because it's generally been shown by that implementation experience that subseting specifications is not a good thing (so you either need to bring in all of the spec or nothing, or it confuses peoples expectations) and that styling a styling language causes further confusions in users as well as implementation difficulties. I'd encourage the SVG WG not to subset CSS further and either import everything (which I do not beleive is possible since the rendering models are different) or to not add and potentially even look at deprecating the existing CSS properties. Moving to just an sXBL/SVG rendering for the layout in the future. This will need different syntax for the strengths of CSS without an analog in SVG, so it's not directly deprecatable, but I think we we either need proper unification of .CSS and SVG (which I don't believe is possible) or more distinct seperation to avoid the "SVG profile of CSS" problems. >> How do I animate the regions or the text in the regions? > > Solved by the above? Could you give an example of the syntax used to animate a flow-shape property in a CSS stylesheet? Jim.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 15:15:23 UTC