- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:38:43 +0100
- To: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, ietf-types@iana.org
* Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Please don't rewrite the TAG finding. The TAG indicates that >User agents should 'notify' the user of the problem. It does not say >that these documents must be rejected. Appendix F.1 of the SVG 1.1 Recommendation requires that rendering must stop after a fatal error as defined in the XML 1.0 Recommendation has been encountered, which in case of the relevant documents means after reading the very first octet of the binary resource. The TAG finding, even if it disagrees with the SVG 1.1 Recommendation, has no authority to override this conformance requirement. > I might also point out 4.2 where the last paragraph says: > > Representation providers SHOULD NOT in general specify the > character encoding for XML data in protocol headers since the data > is self-describing. > > Which would seem to support not including the character encoding >in the SVG mime type. It does not. It says you should not use the charset parameter, it does not say XML MIME Type registrations should define inconsistent processing rules for XML resources that use the charset parameter. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 17:39:06 UTC