- From: Hauke <hauke@SVGxpert.de>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:23:47 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: chris <chris@w3.org>
Thanks for responding, Chris. On 15 Oct 2003 at 17:00, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 4:28:42 PM, Hauke wrote: > H> are there limitations concerning proportion or resolution of the SVGT > H> compliant? > H> e.g. the size of a Nokia-3650-display?! ;-) > > You don't have to know the pixel resolution of a 3650 to enter, and > you would probably be marked down if your entry specified width and > height in pixels and looked like crap at a slightly different > resolution. > > Width and height of 100%, a viewbox, clip and overflow set > appropriately and a colored rectangle larger than viewbox to provide > resiliency against moderate differences in aspect ratio, on the other > hand, would probably be seen as good design. i am aware of that. i don't own such a fancy handset. so, i was just wondering if there are something like standards concering ratio of width and height (of dispalys)? squarish, landscape or portrait-format - probably the third choice should be the one... > H> Hauke ChristopH - www.svgxpert.de > > Also, text in the entry does not need to be in English - it can be in > any language you choose, although since the SVG working group does not > speak all languages, a translation into a language they do speak > (English, Japanese, French, German, Swedish ... ) would be helpful. if you would have been more patient you would have been given the translation right away. it comes just after the german announcment! ;-) unfortunately - i won't have the time to realise my ideas as soon as i would like to... Thanks anyway - especially for providing such an awesome standard!! Hauke
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:24:03 UTC