- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:25:37 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote in message news:3F8BF0BB.20703@pinkjuice.com... > > Jim Ley wrote: > > [...] the W3 HTML versions are only recommendations, > > Just in case this confuses some: Final SVG specifications such as > SVG 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/ Indeed, but there are also HTML versions such as the ISO one, which are not W3 recommendations, this shows the flexibility of HTML and demonstrates a method where you can have valid HTML (or even XHTML) documents, that contain other attributes. When publishing for a small set of user agents (such as those that support the Adobe SVG Plugin) it seems to me entirely appropriate to use such methods as part of your QA process. I don't publish SVG's other than as a link, I don't believe embedding in a page at all is appropriate for the web today, however it might be appropriate in intranets. and there embed is the most sensible approach. Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2003 09:26:51 UTC