- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:38:30 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Tue 2003-11-25 Cameron McCormack wrote: > Tobias Reif: > > XSLT 2 can be used without W3C XML Schema, and implementers won't > > be required to implement WXS: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#import-schema > > "3.13 Importing Schema Components > > Note: > > The facilities described in this section are not available with a > > basic XSLT processor. They require a schema-aware XSLT processor, > > as described in 21 Conformance." > > I think though that XML Schema could be quite useful in specifying > the structure and types of custom elements used in RCC, so I would > be willing to burden the implementers with this down the road. :-) If the effort required to implement SVG is too high then the relevant consequence is not that some developer is unhappy but that SVG won't be implemented widely and completely. I want to see SVG implemented in Free Software browsers, desktop environments, and graphics (authoring) applications. The burden is very high already: video, RCC, etc, and SVG 1.0 already was 700 pages. It's not specifically about WXS, I just wanted to point express my general concern. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Monday, 24 November 2003 17:37:36 UTC