- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:54:41 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote:
> Yes and just read it - its so simple and clear.
yep :)
eg
<define name="Flow.model">
<zeroOrMore>
<choice>
<text/>
<ref name="Heading.class"/>
<ref name="Block.class"/>
<ref name="List.class"/>
<ref name="Inline.class"/>
<ref name="Misc.class"/>
</choice>
</zeroOrMore>
</define>
Having a nicely organized main normative schema written in such nice and
simple XML for SVG will be really great for people writing tools which
work with SVG.
> There are various ways
> of writing RNG, one is the heavily nested, one big blob way, another
> is the 'dtd like' small definitions way; which i prefer and which this
> modularization uses.
I also prefer this style.
> TR> Perhaps Relax NG is a candidate format for the main SVG schema?
>
> Yes; because then we can form XHTML2+SVG profiles with ease.
Sounds great!
Tobi
--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 04:55:52 UTC