SVG 1.0/1.1 missing-glyph required, why?

• From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:15:53 -0000
• To: www-svg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <bfv5la$61n$1@main.gmane.org>

Hi,

Missing-glyph is a required child of the font element, it seems odd, in a
self contained non-editable document, the only way a glyph could be
not-found is author incompetence, why do we require it to be a child?  I
don't see the value.

Jim.

Received on Saturday, 26 July 2003 20:16:47 UTC