- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:13:57 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > > encoding="iso-8859-1" & http://validator.w3.org > > Is there a great reason why the SVG images* in the spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ don't validate? Some may be invalid, but they can only fix them if you list the URLs, and it might also help to include the validity related error messages you see. > Is there a plan to validate SVG images at some time in the future? > This seems a rather poor practice, web accessibility and SVG have such > great potential! But you're complaining to the wrong people. You describe a problem with http://validator.w3.org/ , so please report that issue (in more detail) at http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html . The single SVG document from the spec you list is valid. Results from the validators listed on http://www.pinkjuice.com/check/ : http://snurl.com/1qi1 http://snurl.com/1qi2 http://snurl.com/1qi3 It also is valid against http://www3.sppd.ne.jp/lena/relax-ng/svg11/ : C:\del>jing svg11/svg11.rng rect01.svg C:\del> ... and the local versions of the validators also say it's valid: C:\del>rxp -V -N -s -x rect01.svg C:\del>xmllintval --nowarning rect01.svg C:\del>domcount rect01.svg Warning at file http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg-style.mod, line 74, char 22 Message: Attribute 'xml:space' has already been declared for element 'style' Errors occurred, no output available C:\del> [the above is a warning, not an error] Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Sunday, 6 July 2003 18:14:31 UTC