Re: SVG 1.1 errata

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Ossi Nyk?nen wrote:

> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I was going through the SVG 1.1 specification to see what's changed due to
> the modularization and noticed that there seems to be a minor editing
> bug in the references at
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/refs.html#ref-XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG
> 
> The text "@@fixme" looks like an unwanted echo from the editing process?

Oops. My bad.
I'll check to see if this is covered by our rules on changing
RECs, or if it will need an errata.

> (If this is the worst error in SVG 1.1, you're done expceptional work ;)

I don't have evidence of any other goof-ups yet. I'm sure they
are there.

Dean's prediction: at least 10 similar bugs found by end 2003.

Thanks for the careful checking.

Dean

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 07:40:31 UTC