- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:17:17 EST
- To: chris@w3.org, public-svg-print@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
- CC: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com
- Message-ID: <106.1fed6cc7.2b838c5d@aol.com>
In a message dated 18/02/2003 10:01:18 GMT Standard Time, chris@w3.org writes: > Aac> what additional colour spaces might be added etc. > > Did you have any particular requests? Device CMYK, Color managed CMYK, > LAB, Hexachrome, spot colors, metallics, varnishes? Chris, In the context of svg-print I don't feel too anxious. CMYK would likely be highest on my list, but I hadn't anticipated that you would overlook it. And you haven't. I do fancy playing with LAB under programmatic control in SVG. It might let me move forward from tentative exploration to feeling I am in control (at least at times). The reason I am copying this to www-svg is that my main request to the SVG WG currently would be that I would like to see more visible and timely coordination re SVG and XForms. Within days of the XForms CR being released last Autumn several of us asked on www-svg about XForms and SVG. With no new SVG 1.2 WD yet released it seems there will be, at best, limited opportunity to comment on SVG and XForms before the XForms CR comment period closes in a couple of weeks. In my view that is disappointing. I think XForms and SVG have enormous potential synergy. It would be nice to have the opportunity to explore that potential synergy further before the XForms CR period closes. Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 08:17:57 UTC