- From: Sigurd Lerstad <sigler@bredband.no>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:14:03 +0100
- To: "Sigurd Lerstad" <sigler@bredband.no>, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, <www-svg@w3.org>
> > > > > "Sigurd Lerstad" <sigler@bredband.no>=> > > >A Declarative syntax to the 'addEventListener' DOM method is preferred > for > > >the same reason that declarative animation is preferred over doing all > your > > >animation with scripting. > > > > I don't agree with that statement, declaritive animation is sensible, > since > > everything can be defined in the XML, with xml-events, all you're doing is > > xml-ifying a tiny fraction of the script event handling, which to my mind, > > gives us nothing, and increases the content/script confusion. In the non > > xml-events method I can go > > > > <script xlink:href="script.js"/> > > > > as the sole way of attaching events, and the associated script, with > > xml-events I don't have that option, and content is less seperated. How about extending the XML Events module so you can have the ability to have an external xml file <listeners> <listener observer="someid" handler="somehandler" ... </listeners> Then you completely separate it. (I think hlink does something like that) -- Sigurd Lerstad
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 10:11:13 UTC