- From: Robert Diblasi <rdiblas@wpo.it.luc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:21:21 -0600
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
Hello SVG Working Group, I would like to ask and have explained to me one or two statements in the SVG 1.1. Questions: From my reading of Sections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 in the specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/intro.html#Modularization http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/intro.html#ElementAndAttributeCollections It seems as though a subset module (basic) can have the same name as a complete module( also called the "superset" of a subset). Is this true? A module without the "Basic" prefix "implies" that the module includes the complete set of elements and attributes, with no restrictions. But, a subset module "may" define a different named collection from the superset module. Maybe I am not understanding something :-) ....but this seems to suggest that a subset could have the same name a complete module. This should not be allowed.....or is there some reason for this feature....or am I missing something Here are the sentences that are causing the problem. <snip section"1.1.1 Modularization"> A module without the "Basic" prefix implies that the module includes the complete set of elements and attributes, with no restrictions, from the corresponding section of the specification. If there is a need to provide a subset of the functionality of the complete module, then a Basic module is created with the "Basic" prefix added to the name of the complete module. </snip> Notice the word "implies" and then I read this sentence from section 1.1.2 <snip section="1.1.2 Element and Attribute collections"> A subset module (ie. a Basic module) may define a different named collection from a superset module. </snip> Notice the word "may" Please respond to this issus....I believe there could be a further negitive implication if modules can have the same name. We all learn by sharing what we know Robert A. DiBlasi rdiblasi@svgnotebook.com http://www.svgnotebook.com Member of the Chicago SVG Group: Chicago IL.
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 14:41:35 UTC