- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:49:19 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Fred P." <fprog26@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BAY2-F14757OHFE8Pvs0002f4c7@hotmail.com... > I was more looking for an efficient solution, > XML-RPC and SOAP support are good enough for me. They are not good enough for a chat application! you need to be able to push data to clients, bandwidth costs are way too high with pull. > Robin> protocols on top of it, would you be satisfied? > > That would be too low level for me at least =) But if someone did it for you? For me XML-RPC/SOAP is way too high level, and comes with serious overhead that I have no interest in. I'm currently working on SMPP, which as an end result will draw pretty graphs, with sockets in SVG, I could have my client in SVG, and not push data to it in some other way. > Robin> If it worked along the lines of "for each connection to a new > Robin> address:port combination, prompt the user to accept the connection > (with the > Robin> option to accept connections to that address:port combination every > time)" would > Robin> it be a problem? Not secure enough? Too obtrusive? > > That would be a really awful way of dealing with the problem. Do you have an alternative - using a server is not an appropriate solution, SVG is not only delivered via HTTP, and HTTP is not a good protocol for a huge number of use cases. > Talking to a Server via SOAP/XML-RPC looks more natural. That's http only, we need other protocols, http is useless for many things, we need push. > It would be also easier to have a real implementation on the SERVER > in Java, Perl, Python, C/C++ or similar, than some primitive JavaScript. There's no requirement that javascript be the only language available in an svg viewer. Jim.
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 11:49:24 UTC