- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:51:42 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
ksmrq@netscape.net wrote: > The only conclusion I could draw was that declarative animation is > not meant to be taken seriously. I think it is meant to be taken seriously, and I also think there is a lot of room for evolution, both in SMIL ani and in SVG's SMIL ani. > Scripts and the DOM are the > intended method. For what you are describing, script may indeed be the best way, at least with SVG1.0. Perhaps these are interesting for you: http://www.kevlindev.com/ http://www.kevlindev.com/dom/path_data/index.htm http://pilat.free.fr/english/ > I have posted the issue for four reasons: [...] 2) community service, > to improve the design for everyone; Thanks! Always a good reason to post here. Perhaps the WG will consider some of your suggestions for inclusion. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Monday, 18 November 2002 11:51:36 UTC