- From: Goessner / MecXpert <goessner@mecxpert.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:08:12 +0200
- To: <www-style@w3.org>, <www-svg@w3.org>
From: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> > Dean, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002May/0122.html > for the missive that started the discussion, and follow the thread. From: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> Some people don't like the existing names and want to design a whole new set. There have been no good proposals for how to do that. Its a non-terminating thread, once you factor in fear of color theory at one end and a desire to make color names, uniquely, not be in any human language at the other end (hey! maybe HTML should add <tête> and <corps> tags, for the French market? ) thanks for enlightening me. all is much more understandable now. * i use color names as a memory aid. so i can remember the names of those colors, that mainly fit my needs. * i don't care if the colors are evenly distributed. * may be there is a set of color names that will better fit my needs. ok, i am up for learning these new names if the benefit is big enough. but i don't want to update all my existing svg documents. these color names are something, what i would call a 'de facto standard'. -- stefan goessner "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is. " - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 08:02:19 UTC