- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 17:15:25 +0200
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, "fantasai" <fantasai@escape.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Tantek: > >> A reasonable proposal - but I will not deprecate them in CSS3 unless the > >> SVG working group also deprecates in SVG 1.1. Steven: > > That's not how W3C works. They're not in CSS3 yet. Tantek: > Ah, but they are in CSS. CSS is independent of any particular markup > language. There is no such thing as CSS for a particular set of tags or > namespaces. If any spec at W3C adds CSS properties or values, they are > added for use in CSS with any other spec. Arguing about that doesn't make > it not so - that's how CSS works. > > By adding the X11 colors to the "color" property, SVG added them to CSS. Nice try, but that's not how it works either. I will agree that they are in SVG, but I cannot agree that means they are in CSS. It may mean that the SVG has requested they be added to CSS (have they?), but not that are in by default: there is no CSS spec that includes them, and that is the point we are discussing. > > You have to show > > consensus, which judging by the responses in this group, does not yet exist. > > But consensus is precisely what I am trying build on this issue. I understand. > There appears to be consensus in www-style to deprecate the X11 colors. I don't see that. There were objections to adding X11 styles, and one suggestion was to add them and immediately deprecate them. Another suggestions was *not* to add them and deprecate them in SVG. > Since this issue affects SVG, I think the consensus must include www-svg as > well, either way, hence I expanded the discussion to that forum. Possibly. They should at least be aware of the objections to the bad design of the X11 color set (newcomers, see the thread starting http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002May/0122.html) > > If one person feels strongly against an issue it's hard to get it through > > the REC process. > > As I said, it has already gotten through the REC process, and from the likes > of it, only because the folks on www-style who do not like the X11 colors in > general do not appear to review SVG and other W3C specs. I understand and > sympathize with the number of specs that W3C produces, but this is still no > excuse. Personally I didn't care enough about SVG to fight. I care enough about CSS that I don't want to see it spoiled. > However, if, as you say, it's hard to get it through the REC process, then > presumably SVG 1.1 has similar issues to CSS3 color with respect to the X11 > colors, since neither is a REC yet. Therefore, these two groups must > resolve this matter one way or another in order to proceed with both of > these specs. Only if one agrees that SVG and CSS have to be consistent. Best wishes, Steven
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 11:16:34 UTC