Re: The 'image/svg+xml' Media Type

On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 08:40, Jim Ley wrote:


> > JL> whatever objections may be found to image/svg+xml .
> >
> > Such as?
> I've not seen a draft... I have reservations about it being in the image
> space at all, it seems to fit better in application/*  (are there not
> risks with non svg aware agents consider image/svg+xml to be binary data
> for example?)

I don't think it's reasonable to assume "image" means the representation
isn't textual. The registry already seems to be populated with some that


Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 18:19:08 UTC