- From: Brian Cuthie <brian@systemix.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 16:59:08 -0500
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00e401c2a229$b8639cd0$0a01a8c0@gizmo>
Hello, I've got a drawing application (Visio like drawings for the Pocket PC, www.pocketdraw.com) that uses a slightly modified SVG as its native file format. SVG support has been limited to the stuff which is necessary for diagramming, with some additional elements and attributes (new namespace) added to support concepts such as connecting lines between objects. While working on the SVG exporter, I was horrified to discover that I slightly misinterpreted the SVG marker behavior. In my implementation, markers inherit attributes *after* they're deep cloned into the context of their reference. This ensures that arrows, for example, take on the color of the line that they're applied to. I see now that this is not how SVG implements markers, leading me to wonder why. Am I the only one who thinks the current SVG marker behavior is wrong? I can't help but question the utility of a marker that doesn't automatically match the line it's applied to. Are all my "red" lines supposed to use different marker definitions than my "black" ones? It seems to me that you can always explicitly specify attributes in the marker definition if you want its appearance fixed. But the SVG behavior allow for marker reuse among lines with different attributes. Any opinions? Am I missing something? Cheers, -brian
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 17:05:11 UTC