SVG Errata (was Re: DOCTYPE)

Tobi (and others),

Congratulations on causing the first errata for SVG to
be published (although we are calling it a clarification :)

http://www.w3.org/2001/09/REC-SVG-20010904-errata
(linked from the REC)

Dean



On Wed, 05 Sep 2001, Tobias Reif wrote:

> Which one of the following is correct?
> 
> (spec)
> <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN"
>   "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">
> 
> (or)
> <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN"
>   "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">
> 
> (or)
> ...
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tobias Reif
> http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml
> 
> go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun
> http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 10:30:14 UTC