- From: Pankaj Kamthan <kamthan@cs.concordia.ca>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 18:03:45 -0400
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- CC: tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com
Tobias, "Which one of the following is correct? (spec) <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG- 20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd"> (or) <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG- 20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd"> (or) ..." This is a good one (considering the announcement of the recommendation is still hot from the oven). Actually BOTH the FPIs "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN" [1] and "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" [2] are mentioned in the Specification. Since in both cases the System Identifier is identical (the URI specified in the system literal is same, the resource is the same file), I would conclude that the SVG FPI is not canonical. I realize that this does not answer your question, only inflates it. Pankaj [1] See for example, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#NewDocument . [2] See for example, the SVG DTD http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/svgdtd.html .
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 18:04:49 UTC