- From: Jeff Tupper / Pedagoguery Software Inc <tupper@peda.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:50:03 -0500
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: Vincent Hardy <vincent.hardy@sun.com>, AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
Vincent and Andrew, Thanks for the replies. In return: At 9:53 AM +0100 11/5/01, Vincent Hardy wrote: >I am not sure and I think it would be better for someone at Adobe >to give an answer. We have done fairly extensive tests in Batik and >I do not know whether or not Adobe implemented that area of the >spec. Also, I think Adobe does not support external <use> (i.e., ><use> elements with an xlink:href to an external document and >all the Batik examples have an external <use>). At 4:18 AM -0500 11/5/01, AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: >The documentation for Adobe SVG Viewer RC1 indicates that external >files are not supported for the <use> element. I am not using extern files with <use>. I define my pattern with <defs> just prior to using it (all in one file). Does anyone have an example of an SVG file with a visible overflow pattern that works with the Adobe SVG plug-in? At 9:53 AM +0100 11/5/01, Vincent Hardy wrote: >Does your export work with Batik as you expected? Batik generates the output I expect. At 9:53 AM +0100 11/5/01, Vincent Hardy wrote: >You tool seem really >great and it would be nice to have the SVG export you want: looking >at your product description, I understand why patterns with overflow >are important to you. Thanks. It would be nice if, with SVG, you could specify patterns whose generating translations are not perpendicular (although I may be able to work around it with skewed patterns). If overflow causes problems (or is not implemented) for common browsers, I could work around it, at the expense of slightly larger files. I haven't looked through the SVG documentation much, but I do wonder if the output from using patterns with visible overflow is well-defined. (Is the order of rendering elements of a pattern defined? What should happen when an element of a pattern overlaps another instance of itself? Tess doesn't run into this as all of its elements are 100% opaque and are a single colour.) Jeff --
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 11:50:24 UTC