- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 00:22:47 +0100
- To: "Eran Galil" <eran.galil@emblaze.com>, <www-svg@w3.org>
IMHO, the fact that SVG is XML based, with a full, essentially open spec gives it advantages that override anything that Flash is likely too offer in the near future - if you start from a point of standardisation & interoperability, you can work out performance issues later, whereas if you start proprietry, you're going to stay proprietry. There's a point-to-point comparison at: http://www.carto.net/papers/svg/comparison_flash_svg.html Cheers, Danny. --- Danny Ayers http://www.isacat.net Alternate email (2001) : danny666@virgilio.it danny_ayers@yahoo.co.uk >-----Original Message----- >From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org]On >Behalf Of Eran Galil >Sent: 03 November 2001 21:15 >To: www-svg@w3.org >Subject: SVG versus FLASH > > >Hi everybody. > >One of most common questions which im being asked when i start explaining >people >on SVG, and it's benefits, is how is it compared to flash (plugin >footprints, presentation sizes, functionality)... > >Does anyone knows a reference to a detailed comparison between the two, >benchmarking done >or other material like that ? > >Thanks. >Eran. >
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2001 18:26:24 UTC