- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Stefan, 1) is a good point; simple tags to describe arcs are needed. (they were on my list too http://www.pinkjuice.com/SVG/spec-prop.xhtml#syntax ) 2) is inteersting too. 3) : could you give some examples? Maybe in SVG2 pseudo-code ;) You may want to check my wishlist: http://www.pinkjuice.com/SVG/spec-prop.xhtml Tobi > > i consider these 3 features worth a discussion: > > 1) arc element, maybe > <arc cx cy rx ry start-angle sweep-angle /> > > <arc cx cy rx /> // .. we have the <circle> element with this .. > <arc cx cy rx ry /> // .. we have the <ellipse> element with this .. > > .. and appropriate default values. ( i know of no thread discussing > this, but i am sure it happened!) > > 2) <angularGradient ..> > * with <linearGradient> i can emulate a cylinders shading > * with <radialGradient> a sphere's shading can be modelled > * currently we cannot emulate the shading of a cone > > 3) parameterized groups (very important) > i am sure you discuss this. vml has something like parameterization. > so there must be a reason not to include that > into svg 1.0. Hopefully the argument was to delay parameterization > until svg 2.0. > > .. more may follow > > -- > stefan goessner > -- Tobias Reif http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.htm
Received on Friday, 11 May 2001 11:49:46 UTC