- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:37:49 -0800
- To: Stephane Conversy <conversy@emn.fr>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
At 11:23 AM 3/23/01 +0100, Stephane Conversy wrote: >Hello. > >There is an inconstitency between idl and dtd+RFC for >the 'orient' attribute in marker. > >There is an 'orient' attribute in the dtd, but in the idl we have >both an 'orientType' and an 'orientAngle' attribute. > >Which one is right, the dtd or the idl ? Both are correct. The DTD specifies an attribute that can take either a keyword value 'auto' or an <angle>. The SVG DOM represents the 'orient' attribute via two DOM attributes, the first of which (orientType) is an enumeration which indicates whether the keyword 'auto' or an <angle> was provided. orientType can have one of the following values: // Marker Orientation Types const unsigned short SVG_MARKER_ORIENT_UNKNOWN = 0; const unsigned short SVG_MARKER_ORIENT_AUTO = 1; const unsigned short SVG_MARKER_ORIENT_ANGLE = 2; Then, if orientType==SVG_MARKER_ORIENT_ANGLE, then you look at orientAngle to retrieve the <angle> value. Jon Ferraiolo SVG Editor jferraio@adobe.com >regards, > >-- >stephane conversy >ecole des mines de nantes >
Received on Friday, 23 March 2001 13:02:01 UTC