- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:58:32 +0100
- To: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- CC: "'www-svg@w3.org'" <www-svg@w3.org>
"Pawson, David" wrote: > > Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > >There have been numerous requests for this feature. Unfortunately, it > >doesn't look like it is going to happen with SVG 1.0. The SVG > >working group > >decided against this feature for SVG 1.0 very early when we were > >identifying the graphics feature set for the upcoming > >language. One reason > >is that XHTML/CSS/XSL do word wrap > <snip/> > > Thanks for the reply Jon. > XSL is not much good here with todays implementations. > CSS does word wrap? > CSS2? CSS1 and CSS2 and XSL all use a nested box, flow layout model. > or by setting miniscule margins/big padding? Margins and padding are not the issue here. > XHTML? No different from SVG surely? Not sure what comparison is being made here. XHTML does not define a layout model. SVG does, because it uses the other machinery of style languages (selectors/patterns, cascading, inheritance, properties) but needs a different rendering model. > OK, will it be in SVG 1.1? Why, when it is already in CSS1? However, CSS3 is likely to introduce a property which switches the rendering model - box/area, svg, math, none - so that a mixture of flowed text and graphics can be styled. > Also, a request to viewer developers. > In HTML, when I have an image with alt text, it shows > when the mouse hovers over it. In some UAs, and when there is no title text. But yes. > The desc and title elements on the IBM viewer appear unused. > Is this the case? How might they be handled? For graphical, visual styling of SVG, the title might be used as a tooltip and the spec suggests this. However, there elements are more useful for exploring a graphic in other presentational modes, or for searching and indexing. > ps. Nice job folks. I'm having fun with it. > Are you interested in general comments re the wd? Yes, we are. -- Chris
Received on Monday, 14 February 2000 07:58:42 UTC