- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 14:37:47 -0800
- To: andreww@netscape.com (Andrew Wooldridge)
- Cc: svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Andrew, The SVG working group has to decide on a case-by-base basis whether a given reference can be local, external or either. We haven't really tackled that issue in any depth yet. I believe the intent is that the "either" approach is preferred unless there is a compelling reason why only local or only external references would be allowed. In the case of template objects, I would expect that we'll end up deciding on "either" (which means the template can either be defined within the same SVG document or be a reference to a different SVG document). It is just too useful in the case of templates to allow for external references, and I don't see a good reason for restrictions. Jon At 01:11 PM 2/26/99 -0800, Andrew Wooldridge wrote: >In section 4.4 it talks about using template objects. But the example is >only using one template object from the same file in other locations in >that file. Is it indeed the case that I could have separate SVG files >which I could point to via the USE tag? > >If so I would like to request that that is explicitly mentioned here in >4.4 > >Like: > ><use xml:link="simple" show="embed" actuate="auto" > >href="http://www.svg.org/images/baloons.svg#TemplateObject01" /> > > > >This helps to eliminate ambigutity and helps with building dynamic svg >docs. > >-- > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- Andrew Wooldridge - Opinions expressed are my own - >- andreww@netscape.com - http://people.netscape.com/andreww/ >- my Q: 11111 - my ICQ: 6345881 >
Received on Friday, 26 February 1999 17:35:31 UTC