- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:15:43 -0800
- To: "Duncanson, Ian (Ex AS01)" <IDuncans@honeywell.com.au>
- Cc: "'www-svg@w3.org'" <www-svg@w3.org>
At 10:18 AM 2/24/99 +1100, Duncanson, Ian (Ex AS01) wrote: >Is it envisaged that the <pieslice/> shape will be able to be specified as >an arc or a wedge (i.e. closed or not closed)? What do you think? The working group welcomes all suggestions about the advisability and exact feature set for vector graphics shapes (Chapter 12 in current spec) such as <pieslice/>. Some members of the working group take the position that we shouldn't have higher-level vector graphics shapes such as <pieslice/>. <pieslice/>, in particular, is probably the weakest candidate in list because it probably would have the least usage. (It is unlikely that <pieslice/> would offer the exact behavior people need and thus people will be likely to just define a <path> with an arc instead.) Incidentally, my thinking is that if we put in <pieslice/> it would always be a closed shape (i.e., three "sides": two segments starting from the center point shooting off at <startangle> and <endangle>, respectively, and an arc connecting the two segments). Jon Ferraiolo Adobe Systems Incorporated Member SVG working group
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 1999 12:13:07 UTC