- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:07:20 -0800
- To: andreww@netscape.com (Andrew Wooldridge)
- Cc: svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Andrew, Sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me. I agree that <althtml> is a bad name and that <nosvg> is consistent with the approaches in other languages. I'll make sure that we address this issue in the WG before the next public draft. Jon Ferraiolo Adobe Systems Incorporated Member of the SVG Working Group (& editor of the latest spec) At 10:52 AM 2/16/99 -0800, Andrew Wooldridge wrote: >It seems to me that the ALTHTML tag is too specific. What if HTML is >not used at all here? >Shouldn't it be something more generic like <ALT> >Or perhaps follow the precedent set by frames, embedding,layers, script >which all use: ><noembed> ><noframes> ><nolayer> ><noscript> > >So why not use > ><nosvg> instead? > > >-- > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- Andrew Wooldridge - Opinions expressed are my own - >- andreww@netscape.com - http://people.netscape.com/andreww/ >- my Q: 11111 - my ICQ: 6345881 >
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 1999 14:05:03 UTC