Friday, 31 March 2000
Saturday, 1 April 2000
Friday, 31 March 2000
Thursday, 30 March 2000
Friday, 31 March 2000
Wednesday, 29 March 2000
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
Wednesday, 29 March 2000
- Re: background-color:transparent vs. background-color:inherit
- Re: background-color:transparent vs. background-color:inherit
- background-color:transparent vs. background-color:inherit
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- MacIE 5.0 CSS bug
- Re: CSS
- CSS
- MacIE 5.0 ships with full CSS-1 support (was Re: CSS and namespaces?)
Friday, 24 March 2000
- Re: anonymous table objects
- Re: Opera and CSS, was Re: CSS and namespaces?
- Re: Opera and CSS, was Re: CSS and namespaces?
Thursday, 23 March 2000
Friday, 24 March 2000
Thursday, 23 March 2000
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
- background-attachment
- Re: What's the use of visibility: collapse on table rows?
- Re: What's the use of visibility: collapse on table rows?
Thursday, 23 March 2000
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
Tuesday, 21 March 2000
Monday, 20 March 2000
- Re: CSS and namespaces?
- Re: CSS and namespaces?
- RE: CSS and namespaces?
- Re: CSS and namespaces?
- Re: CSS and namespaces?
- CSS and namespaces?
- Re: Very bad errors in positioning
- Re: Very bad errors in positioning
- Compact/run-in amendments
- Very bad errors in positioning
Saturday, 18 March 2000
Friday, 17 March 2000
Thursday, 16 March 2000
Wednesday, 15 March 2000
- RE: default.css
- Re: TABLES: table-column elements will only be children of table-cells.
- TABLES: table-column elements will only be children of table-cells.
Wednesday, 14 April 1999
Monday, 13 March 2000
Sunday, 12 March 2000
Saturday, 11 March 2000
Friday, 10 March 2000
Thursday, 9 March 2000
- Re: default value for @charset in CSS2
- Feedback requested: features wanted in test suite v2
- own engine browser
Tuesday, 7 March 2000
Monday, 6 March 2000
- RE: width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
- RE: width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
Saturday, 4 March 2000
- RE: clarification of "auto" problem
- clarification of "auto" problem
- Re: width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
- RE: interpretation of "auto" for block-level elements
- Re: interpretation of "auto" for block-level elements
- RE: interpretation of "auto" for block-level elements
- Re: interpretation of "auto" for block-level elements
- Re: Shrinkwrap, Floats, and Tables
- Re: Horizontal rules
- Re: Shrinkwrap, Floats, and Tables
Friday, 3 March 2000
- Re: Shrinkwrap, Floats, and Tables
- positioning
- interpretation of "auto" for block-level elements
- Re: Specificity of HTML
- Re: Specificity of HTML
- UI WD sample style sheet
- Specificity of HTML
- RE: Horizontal rules
- RE: width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
- Re: width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
- Re: Horizontal rules
- width of absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements
Wednesday, 1 March 2000
- Re: Rounded corners
- Re: Rounded corners
- Re: Rounded corners
- UI WD (another error in sample style sheet)
- Re: Heights of static block elements
- RE: Problem with @page within @media
- (Another reason) Why BR can't be considered as inline-level
- Names of the new content types
- RE: Problem with @page within @media
- RE: Problem with @page within @media
- Re: Horizontal rules
- Re: Horizontal rules
- Re: Rounded corners