Thursday, 28 August 1997
Wednesday, 27 August 1997
- Re: Constants & Environment Variables
- Re: Constants & Environment Variables
- re: New W3C Note: Potential Enhancements to CSS
Tuesday, 26 August 1997
- Constants & Environment Variables
- CSS1.0 Cleanup - cursors
- background height and width
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Font Size discrepancies across platforms (was Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....)
- Re: CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- Re: CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- CSS1.0 Cleanup - marker pseudo element
Monday, 25 August 1997
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- Re: CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- NOTE-css-potential: CSS1.0 cleanup: marker
- NOTE-css-potential: CSS1.0 cleanup: break
- accessibility and post-processing style sheets
- NOTE-css-potential: CSS1.0 cleanup: magnification
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
Sunday, 24 August 1997
Monday, 25 August 1997
Sunday, 24 August 1997
- CSS1.0 Cleanup - text shadows
- CSS1.0 Cleanup - magnification
- CSS1.0 Cleanup - line breaks
- Font Size discrepancies across platforms (was Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....)
Saturday, 23 August 1997
Friday, 22 August 1997
- Percentage height in CSS Positioning
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
- Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
Thursday, 21 August 1997
Wednesday, 20 August 1997
- RE: A single specification
- RE: A single specification
- Re: A single specification
- A single specification
Tuesday, 19 August 1997
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for colum
- absolute positioning form elements
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
Monday, 18 August 1997
- Re: Context Selectors and SGML
- Re: Extensions of CSS for horizontal layout / columns
- Re: Extensions of CSS for horizontal layout / columns
- Context Selectors and SGML
Sunday, 17 August 1997
- Extensions of CSS for horizontal layout / columns
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for colum
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Book opportunity for CSS sites/products
Friday, 15 August 1997
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- html style sheets
- Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
Thursday, 14 August 1997
Wednesday, 13 August 1997
Monday, 11 August 1997
- Re: block formatting
- CSS in FrontPage98
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- block formatting
- block formatting
Sunday, 10 August 1997
Monday, 4 August 1997
Friday, 8 August 1997
Wednesday, 6 August 1997
- text/css media type
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Re: Font-face Descriptors for Matching
- Re: Proprietary extensions to CSS1 already?
- Re: Font-face Descriptors for Matching
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Re: Angle values for azimuth and elevation
- Re: Font-face Descriptors for Matching
- Re: Font-face Descriptors for Matching
- Re: voice-family and pitch
Tuesday, 5 August 1997
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Relative volumes in ACSS
- More negative values in ACSS
- voice-family and pitch
- Re: Bad CSS implementations
- Font-face Descriptors for Matching
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: Bad CSS implementations
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- @page and @media vs. @import
- RE: Bad CSS implementations
- RE: Proprietary extensions to CSS1 already?
- RE: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
Monday, 4 August 1997
- Relative volumes in ACSS
- More negative values in ACSS
- voice-family and pitch
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Angle values for azimuth and elevation
- Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Bad CSS implementations
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Angle values for azimuth and elevation
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties (fwd)
- Re: Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- Negative percentages for ACSS pause properties
- sugar with lemon
- Re: Bad CSS implementations
- RE: yet another broken CSS implementation
- RE: line height vs. margins
- RE: rant rant rant (was: Re: Issue 4: Text-Indent and DIV)
- RE: rant rant rant (was: Re: Issue 4: Text-Indent and DIV)
- Bad CSS implementations
- RE: Issue 4: Text-Indent and DIV
- RE: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- RE: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
Thursday, 31 July 1997
Saturday, 23 April 1994
Monday, 4 August 1997
Sunday, 3 August 1997
- Re: Issue 4: Text-Indent and DIV
- Issue 4: Text-Indent and DIV
- Re: CSSCheck, a Cascading Style Sheets lint
Saturday, 2 August 1997
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd))
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: CSSCheck, a Cascading Style Sheets lint
- Re: WebFonts
- Re: WebFonts
- Re: [No Subject] (fwd)
- Re: embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd))
- Re: embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd))
- Re: line height vs. margins
- line height vs. margins
Friday, 1 August 1997
- Re: <font> vs. CSS: no contest
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: <font> vs. CSS: no contest
- Re: <font> vs. CSS: no contest
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- Re: embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd))
- Re: [No Subject] (fwd)
- <font> vs. CSS: no contest
- Re: CSS vs. transitional markup [was: No Subject]
- embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd)) -Reply
- embedding 3.0-compatible markup (was [No Subject] (fwd))