Saturday, 31 August 1996
- Re: backgrounds
 - strength of extra-CSS style imperatives
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 
Friday, 30 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: backgrounds
 - RE: backgrounds
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - Re: backgrounds
 - scripts and bookmarks
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: backgrounds
 - RE> backgrounds
 - Announcement: Internationalization Symposium
 - style sheet
 - backgrounds
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 
Thursday, 29 August 1996
- Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frame document structure
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 - Re: Frames and Documents
 
Wednesday, 28 August 1996
- Style attribute on element == ID?
 - Style attribute on element == ID?
 - Frames and Documents
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: Little problem with table...
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: Little problem with table...
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: strength of extra-CSS style imperatives
 
Tuesday, 27 August 1996
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Wild prediction
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - RE: CSS Defaults
 
Sunday, 25 August 1996
- RE: CSS Defaults
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - Re: CSS Defaults
 - RE: BGSOUND, no need for it
 - Re: CSS Defualts
 - CSS Defualts
 
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
- Re: strength of extra-CSS style imperatives
 - Little problem with table...
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: strength of extra-CSS style imperatives
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - ARG ... do I missunderstand CSS1
 
Saturday, 24 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - strength of extra-CSS style imperatives
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Frames - does anyone like them?
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: transparancy and RGB()
 
Saturday, 21 August 1976
Wednesday, 21 August 1996
- Re: What's wrong with <object>?
 - Re: What's wrong with <object>?
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - What's wrong with <object>?
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 
Tuesday, 20 August 1996
- Images as alternatives to text instead of the reverse
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: transparancy and RGB()
 - Re: transparancy and RGB()
 - Re: transparancy and RGB()
 
Monday, 19 August 1996
- Re: FW: Do box properties apply to all elements?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: To <P> or not to <P>
 
Saturday, 17 August 1996
- Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 
Friday, 16 August 1996
- Dsssl-o revision
 - Re: To <P> or not to <P>
 - Re: To <P> or not to <P>
 - Re: To <P> or not to <P>
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: To <P> or not to <P>
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - To </P> or not to </P>
 - Re: What are the problems with IDML?
 - What are the problems with IDML?
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- Re: shadows
 - FW: Do box properties apply to all elements?
 - transparancy and RGB()
 - transparancy and RGB()
 
Wednesday, 14 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: Tag Soup.
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: Generic Markup
 
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
Monday, 12 August 1996
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
Monday, 12 August 1996
- Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 
Sunday, 11 August 1996
- Re: font specification in CSS1
 - CSS examples, anyone?
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup
 - Re: Generic Markup
 
Wednesday, 11 August 1976
Sunday, 11 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 
Saturday, 10 August 1996
- Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 
Friday, 9 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - Re: shadows
 - Re: font specification in CSS1
 - shadows
 - font specification in CSS1
 - font specification in CSS1
 
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Functionality of Note via CSS?
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - Generic Markup [was:Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar]
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 
Wednesday, 7 August 1996
- Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Formalize the hyphen?
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Formalize the hyphen?
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 
Tuesday, 6 August 1996
- Re: partial resolution: line-height in MSIE
 - Re: deprecated tags in Wilbur & Cougar -Reply -Reply
 - Re: Shadows.
 - Formalize the hyphen?
 - Re: Shadows.
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - Re: Shadows.
 - Re: Shadows.
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - RE: Problem with float left and drop caps
 
Monday, 5 August 1996
- Re: partial resolution: line-height in MSIE
 - Re: Problem with float left and drop caps
 - Re: partial resolution: line-height in MSIE
 
Saturday, 3 August 1996
Friday, 2 August 1996
- partial resolution: line-height in MSIE
 - Re: line spacing in MSIE...NOT!
 - Re: NO SUBJECT
 - Re: line spacing in MSIE...NOT!
 - Re: line spacing in MSIE...NOT!
 - Re: Margins in MSIE (was font sizes...)