- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:45:45 -0500
- To: www-smil@w3.org
Dear SYMM WG- This is a Last Call review comment from the SVG WG on the SMIL Timesheets 1.0 specification, W3C Working Draft 10 January 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-timesheets-20080110/ . Please let us know if you have any questions by replying to www-svg@w3.org. 1 Introduction "An alternative to Timesheets is XHTML+SMIL [XHTMLplusSMIL] which gives full SMIL functionality as in-line in non-SMIL XML documents. On the other hand, SMIL itself gives full SMIL functionality as in-line XML-based document." The wording here is unclear, and seems to undermine the need for timesheets when XHTML+SMIL already exists. Can you please clarify? The first example seems to imply that timesheets can be used inline or externally, but this passages seems to counterindicate that. Also, what is the relationship of Timesheets and XHTML+SMIL to HTML+Time? [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-HTMLplusTIME Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2008 22:45:53 UTC