Re: Is public XMLSchema correct?

Hi Jack, thank you very much.
I'll write to Mr. Samuel directly.

Alberto



Jack Jansen wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6-May-2008, at 08:00 , Alberto Zanon wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> no one could help me?
> 
> Sorry for the delay. Apparently none of the people from the SYMM group  
> who are also on this list knew the answer, and were expecting someone  
> else to answer. I forwarded it to the internal list, and here's a reply:
> 
>> From: Samuel Cruz-Lara <Samuel.Cruz-Lara@loria.fr>
>> Date: May 14, 2008 10:24:45 GMT+02:00
>> To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
>> Subject: Re: Question on xml schema on public mailing list
>>
>> Please Jack, forward the answer.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Samuel
>>
>> Le 13 mai 08 à 22:50, Jack Jansen a écrit :
>>
>>> Thanks for the work!
>>>
>>> Will you reply (are you on the external list?) or shall I forward  
>>> your answer?
>>> On  13-May-2008, at 08:58 , Samuel Cruz-Lara wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jack,
>>>>
>>>> I have verifyed the XML Schema for SMIL 2.0.
>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/smil20.xsd 
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> The schema is NOT correct.
>>>>
>>>> So, by far, the best thing to do is to work with the SMIL 2.1 DTD.
>>>>
>>>> However, if Alberto ZANON would like to contact me, I can try to  
>>>> work on this DTD in order to obtain a valid XML Schema for him.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Samuel
> 
> If you need more information please contact Samuel directly.
> 
> Hope this helps,
>  Jack
> 
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Alberto
>>
>>
>> Alberto Zanon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm a software developer of an Italian company and I'm developing a
>>> gateway for MMS service.
>>> Purpose of my email is to find out how to validate smil documents  
>>> against
>>> smil xmlschema definition.
>>> When I tried the first time with PHP, it gaves me errors about the
>>> xmlschema definition I supplied
>>> ("http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/smil20.xsd").
>>> As PHP xml classes rely on libxml2 (www.xmlsoft.org), I tried  
>>> directly
>>> with a small C example program,
>>> but results were the same. So I opened a bug in bugzilla.gnome.org
>>> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523004)
>>> They answered that the xmlschema definition seems incorrect about
>>> "smil20-layout.xsd" include.
>>> I report their answer:
>>>
>>> No idea if it's a bug in libxml2 or not.
>>> smil20.xsd includes smil20-layout.xsd around line 22
>>> smil20-layout.xsd uses a reference to a namespaced type
>>> the bindings seems to be done with import statements in
>>> smil20.xsd but after the include.
>>> I don't understand the XSD Part 1 spec, I have no idea
>>> if it's legal to bind to something which was not imported yet
>>> at that point.
>>>
>>> Could you give me some information about this problem?
>>> It will be very appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Alberto
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Is-public-XMLSchema-correct--tp16173269p17071605.html
>> Sent from the w3.org - www-smil mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-public-XMLSchema-correct--tp16173269p17269135.html
Sent from the w3.org - www-smil mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 07:37:10 UTC