- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:50:22 -0500
- To: www-smil@w3.org
- Cc: cam@mcc.id.au
- Message-ID: <da131fde0804072250i1ee98acfi92c3335a5e9266f1@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, Cameraon for the suggestion. SYMM Working Group, Can we have a response on this? I think the feature string hasFeature() check is a good idea, but the feature string would need to be defined in the spec. "org.w3.smil.timesheet" ? Thanks, Jeff On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > > Hi Jeff. > > Jeff Schiller: > > Is there a standard, recommended technique for detecting browser > capability > > when it comes to SMIL? You may be aware of the FakeSmile library: > > http://leunen.d.free.fr/fakesmile/ > > > > I would like to see hwo hard it would be to implement support for SMIL > > Timesheets 1.0 into this library, but I would like to 'future-proof' the > > library such that if (when) browsers start supporting it natively that > the > > script does not run. > > A DOM feature string sounds like the way to go, here, so you could do: > > if (document.implementation.hasFeature("Timesheets", "1.0")) > … > > -- > Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ > xmpp:heycam@jabber.org <xmpp%3Aheycam@jabber.org> ▪ ICQ 26955922 > ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.au > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 05:50:56 UTC