Re: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0)

 Dear Charles F Wiecha ,

The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last
Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language
(SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at www-smil@w3.org if
you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement, you
are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus
with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will
be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be
reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the
next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the SYMM Working Group,
Thierry Michel
W3C Staff Contact

 1. (reference not available)
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/


=====

Your comment on 15. SMIL 3.0 State:
> 2. Relationship between language profile and execution context not
> clear
> 
> Section 15.5.3 states that "The SMIL 3.0 Language Profile specifies
> that
> XPath 1.0 is used as the expression language. "  This section also
> describes the potential for other expression languages to be used with
> SMIL
> 3.0.  Perhaps there is just a wording change required in the first
> sentence
> to clarify that XPath 1.0 is the preferred or default expression
> language.
> 
> In addition, the description of the XPath evaluation context being out
> of
> scope is not clear -- perhaps a link to the defined language profiles
> would
> clarify where the expression context and other issues relevant to XPath
> are
> defined.


Working Group Resolution (LC-1838):
We will change the paragraph to be clearer.

----

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 13:21:25 UTC