- From: Destry Wion <destry@wion.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:00:49 +0200
- To: SMIL List <www-smil@w3.org>
Hello, First time poster here. I've been watching the list topics for about a month now and dialog is pretty technical, so forgive me for the base questions. I've had an interest in SMIL since around 2001. I'm a web standards buff, a technical communicator, and a user interaction specialist by trade so my interest is more with the product interface side of SMIL as opposed to the programming. I think I'm reasonably well-oriented to SMIL; I've read the only two books fully focusing on SMIL that are worth reading (Kennedy's and Bulterman's) as well as Steve Mack's Streaming Media which had some interesting ideas for front-end folks like me, and lately I've been poking through the 3.0 draft, when I find the time (what a whopper). My own interests aside, and as much as I would like to see SMIL get some traction online, that just doesn't appear to be happening. It seems it made a little headway years ago and then just disappeared, and along with it went what few SMIL presentations I once knew about that were worth bookmarking (only about 15, mostly academic stuff, but a few documentary and art pieces that were quite good and creative). Today, I can't find a decent SMIL presentation to save my life...old, new or otherwise. Any reference that comes up in Google always leads to a broken link or a proprietary format that I can't even try to play (I use a Mac). I'd like to turn it to you now: As people with direct hands-on, I'd be curious and thankful for any comments you might give about why SMIL is rare (seemingly extinct) online at this point (whether communication reasons, technology, whatever), what needs to be overcome to turn that around, and/or any predictions you might have for the future of web SMIL. Also, I notice it's been a year to this month that the SYMM Charter hasn't been updated (http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/2004/symm-wg-charter20060601.html), which is also evident in section 12, where it says SMIL 2.0 is the latest recommendation. Since the document is clearly dated, maybe someone can clarify a couple of things. First, I find the reference "Next Generation" (NG) curious, and can only guess it means to indicate SMIL 3.0, is that right? Second, how accurate are the milestones now that it's been a year? Is NG (3.0) still expected to be a CR this month? Thanks for your time and thoughts. Destry Wion wion.com
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2007 06:28:51 UTC