- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:19:29 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: ietf-types@alvestrand.no, www-smil@w3.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, ph@w3.org
On Monday, December 12, 2005, 10:27:14 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> Hi, BH> BH> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoschka-smil-media-type-12.txt BH> is a bit old by now, but I don't think application/smil should be COMMON BH> as it does not use the +xml convention for XML media types. Instead, it BH> should be OBSOLETE and application/smil+xml, defined in the same draft, BH> should be used instead. BH> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/PR-SMIL2-20050927/ only has application/smil BH> (which is not currently registered), it should use application/smil+xml BH> and point out that application/smil is obsolete, assuming that the +xml BH> version will be registered in the not too distant future. Thanks for spotting this, Björn. I suspect it was copied over from SMIL 2.0 which predates the +xml convention. I agree that application/smil+xml should be the preferred type and should be registered. SMIL editors, the procedure to follow is given at http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype.html (and is supposed to start at last call, by the way) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 10:19:28 UTC