- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:17:28 +0100
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-smil@aka.mcc.id.au>, www-smil@w3.org, SYMM <symm@w3.org>
Cameron, The SYMM WG has addressed your issue on SMIL 2.1 PR about giving a time zone with the 'Date' production. We have done two modifications now available in the SMIL 2.1 REC draft http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/Group/2004/spec/REC-smil21-2005-latest/smil-timing.html 1- The following former bullet item "Date wallclock values are treated as a DateTime value of the given date at time 00:00:00.00, that is, midnight on the given date, in the time zone given, or the local time zone if none is specified." is replaced by "Date wallclock values are treated as a DateTime value of the given date at time 00:00:00.00 in the local time zone." 2- The following wrong example was removed begin="wallclock(2000-01-01Z)" These changes now conform to the grammar, Thank you very much for this good catch. Thierry Michel Jack Jansen a écrit : > > > On 11 Nov 2005, at 06:16, Cameron McCormack wrote: > >> >> Perhaps this is a couple of weeks too late, but in SMIL 2.1 PR Timing >> and Synchronization it states: >> >> Date wallclock values are treated as a DateTime value of the given >> date at time 00:00:00.00, that is, midnight on the given date, in the >> time zone given, or the local time zone if none is specified. >> >> but according to the grammar, it is impossible to give a time zone with >> the 'Date' production. >> >> The same problem exists with SMIL 2.0. > > > You're right, and even the examples are wrong:-) There's an example > begin="wallclock(2000-01-01Z)" > but the grammar doesn't allow that. > -- > Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack > If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma > Goldman > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 23:18:42 UTC