Re: Fwd: Possible Errata for SMIL2.0, SMIL Animation, and SVG 1.1 - attributeName and "default namespace" from Vincent Hardy on 2002-12-03 (www-smil@w3.org from October to December 2002)

From: Vincent Hardy <vincent.hardy@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:15:26 +0100
To: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, w3c-svg-wg@w3.org, "Glenn A. Adams" <glenn@xfsi.com>, www-smil@w3.org
Message-ID: <3DEC843E.7030208@sun.com>

I think Glenn is correct too. However, I think that the errata is needed 
for SMIL2 and for SVG as we also have incorrect wording (e.g., 
attributeType definition in 19.2.5 of SVG 1.1).

Vincent.

Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> Glenn's analysis and proposal look correct to me. It seems to me that is 
> needed is a clarification within the SMIL2 errata.
> 
> Jon
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 05:21:16 UTC