- From: Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:47:36 +0200
- To: "Sigurd Lerstad" <sigler@bredband.no>
- cc: www-smil@w3.org
Yep, something like that. Also read up on the Resetting element state section (http://www.w3.org/TR/smil20/smil-timing.html#Timing-ResettingElementState). On Wed, Sep 25 2002 "Sigurd Lerstad" wrote: > > Hello, thank you for answering > > Okay, I was misled by statements like this in the spec: > > "A child element may not be active before the beginning, nor after the end > of the parent simple duration" > > So the children of a time container are restricted to the parent simple > time, so if the parent repeats, the children doesn't know, for them it would > just be as if the parent had just begun, and they will restart from 0 ? > > So while playing, when a parent propagates it's current/active time down to > the children, for a repeating time container, it would propagate times > something like this? > > |parent simple dur--| > |parent active dur-----------------------| > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (time in seconds) (the children > are told to seek to this time, relative to parent) > > (this is of course simplified) > > thanks, > > -- > Sigurd Lerstad > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sjoerd Mullender" <sjoerd@acm.org> > To: "Sigurd Lerstad" <sigler@bredband.no> > Cc: <www-smil@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:22 AM > Subject: Re: multiple begin/end times on <par>/<seq>/<excl> > > > > Yes, they can have multiple begin and end times, and they can also > > repeat. They also do have an active duration defined. > > > > On Wed, Sep 25 2002 "Sigurd Lerstad" wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Just want to clarify some things... > > > > > > Can <seq>/<par>/<excl> > > > > > > have multiple begin/end times ? > > > > > > If I understand correctly, time containers don't use the notion of > > > active duration, they just use simple duration ? So they can't repeat > > > either? (Having said that, maybe they can't have 'end' attribute either, > > > since simple duration calculation doesn't use 'end' ?) > > > > > > thanks, > > > > -- Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd@acm.org> > -- Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd@acm.org>
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 06:47:39 UTC